Q270: Experiments and Models in
Cognitive Science
Implicit Attitudes Test
Laboratory Demonstration:
1.
![]()
Make a judgment of either
1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 on the following scale, rating whether you prefer white people
to black people, or vice versa.
I strongly prefer
white people I slightly prefer
white people I prefer white
and black people equally I slightly prefer
black people I strongly prefer
black people
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
2. Half of the class, randomly
determined, should run "Race Test 1" first and then "Race Test
2," and the other half of the class should use the reverse order.
In each test, you will be asked to categorize faces and
words. If the item belongs to
Category 1, press the "1" key at the top of the keyboard. If the item belongs to Category 2, press
the "2" key. Press the
keys as quickly as you can without making errors.
For "Race
Test 1," black faces and positive words (such as "good") belong
to Category 1;
white faces and negative words (such as "lose") belong
to Category 2.
For "Race
Test 2," black faces and negative words (such as "lose") belong
to Category 1;
white faces and negative words (such as "good") belong
to Category 2.
3. When running "Generic
Laboratory," specify "Race Test 1" or "Race Test 2" as
your file of trials. Set the font
size to 24 and the font to Helvetica.
Then give yourself about 20 practice trials by selecting "run"
and then clicking in the Òabort experimentÓ box after 20 trials have
passed. When running the actual
experiment, set "repetitions of trials" under the "Set up
Experiment" tab to 3 so that you'll see each of the 20 words and 20 faces
3 times each (yielding 120 trials).
Respond slowly enough so that you make only few errors. When you're done, record your response
times and accuracy for the different types of items.
4. Run yourself in the other condition,
giving yourself 20 practice trials first.
5. Anonymously enter your response time
data on correct trials into a single row of a data table for the entire
class with the following 8 columns (pos = positive
words, neg = negative words):
Test1 Test1 Test1 Test1 Test2 Test2 Test2 Test2
Black pos white neg black post white neg
Also record your accuracies on another 8 columns, in
the same order of conditions.
The class will eventually find average response times and
accuracies for the four "Race Test 1" trials, and an average for the
four "Race Test 2" trials, and run a paired T-test to see whether
these two respone time (or accuracy) averages are
different. You may also be curious
about whether the difference between Test 1 and Test 2 are found for the
individual columns. For example,
other researchers have found a "other race advantage": even though
white people are better able to learn names for white faces than black faces
(e.g. learn that "This face is Joe"), they are better to categorize
a black face as "black" faster than they can categorize a white face
as "white." Do you find
the same effect?
Questions
1. Some white
person might argue, "I responded more slowly in Race Test 1 than Race Test
2, but that doesn't mean I'm racist.
It's just that the popular media and the mainstream culture have trained
me to automatically associate black people with certain negative words,
including those used in the experiment.
I don't have a negative unconscious attitude toward black people. It's just that I associate certain words
with blackness due to their pairing in my environment." Describe an experiment that would
distinguish between (1) relatively slow responses on Race Test 1 because black
faces are automatically associated with particular negative words, and (2)
relatively slow responses on Race Test 1 because people have (unconscious)
negative attitudes toward black people in general (and don't just have
particular word-to-blackness associations). In describing your experiment, be very
clear about what pattern of results would indicate (1) and what pattern would
indicate (2).
2. Some white
person might argue, "I responded more slowly in Race Test 1 than Race Test
2, but that doesn't mean I'm racist.
My automatic response might link blackness with negative things, but I
don't act on the basis of this automatic response." Describe an experiment that would reveal
whether performance on the implicit attitude test (IAT) is related to actual
acts that can be construed as racist.
For this purpose, interpret "racist" to mean
"discrimination against a person on the basis of their race in situations
where race is not relevant."
Be clear about how you operationalize racism in your experiment, and
about how you would statistically evaluate the claim for a relation
between the IAT and racist acts.
3. [This is a challenging question, but can
be answered in many ways]. Describe an experiment that would test
whether white people have unconscious negative attitudes toward black faces
using the process dissociation framework described in class and in Jacoby &
Kelley (1992). By this framework,
you will need to create an ÒexclusionÓ task (ÒDonÕt make response X if you
consciously know that YÓ) and an ÒinclusionÓ task (ÒMake response X if you
consciously know that YÓ). The
hallmark of this approach should be that white subjects make some kind of
negative response when a black face is present if they are unconscious of the
black face, but make a positive response if they are conscious of it. Describe the stimuli and tasks that you
would use. What pattern of results
in your experiment would indicate that white subjects have unconscious negative
attitudes toward black faces (giving sample response percentages for exclusion
and inclusion tasks will help you to be precise)?