Goldstone, R. L., Schyns, P. G., & Medin, D. L. (1997).
Learning to bridge between perception and cogntion. in R. L. Goldstone,
P. G. Schyns, & D. L. Medin (Eds.)
Psychology of Learning and
Motivation: Perceptual Learning, Vol. 36. (pp. 1-14). San Diego, CA: Academic
Press.
In building models of cognition, it is customary to commence construction
on the foundations laid by perception. Perception is presumed to provide
us with an initial source of information that is operated upon by subsequent
cognitive processes. And, as with the foundation of a house, a premium is
placed on stability and solidity. Stable edifices require stable support
structures. By this view, our cognitive processes are well behaved to the
degree that they can depend upon the stable structures established by our
perceptual system.
Considered collectively, the contributions to this volume suggest an alternative
metaphor for understanding the relation between perception and cognition.
The architectural equivalent of perception may be a bridge rather than a
foundation. The purpose of a bridge is to provide support, but they do so
by adapting to the supported vehicles. Bridges, by design, sway under the
weight of heavy vehicles, built on the principle that it is better to bend
than break. Bridges built with rigid materials are often less resilient
than their more flexible counterparts. Similarly, the chapters collected
here raise the possibility that perception supports cognition by flexibly
adapting to the requirements imposed by cognitive tasks. Perception may
not be stable, but its departures from stability may facilitate rather than
hamper its ability to support cognition. Cognitive processes involved in
categorization, comparison, object recognition, and language may shift perception,
but perception becomes better tuned to these tasks as a result.
View This
Paper (HTML)